Manitoba Judge Weighs in on PUB Decision

Just as I was considering a post about the dog days of summer, the Manitoba Court of Appeal has provided some fodder for industry watchers. If you are just tuning in, I mentioned in a post on May 2 that The Cash Store was contesting the Manitoba Public Utility Board's ruling on, amongst other things, the maximum allowable rate for payday loans in that province. Here are the relevant details from that post:

Formerly known as Rentcash, The Cash Store Financial Services took things one step further and filed a "Notice of Motion for Leave to Appeal" with the Manitoba Court of Appeal claiming that the Board, among other things, "erred in law and exceeded its jurisdiction by directing itself as being mandated to drive certain payday loan companies out of business and by issuing an order intended to achieve that result..."

After a technical meeting to work out how this process would proceed and who would be involved, the Court of Appeal met on July 16 and 17 to get into the meat of the matter. I am working on getting transcripts from these two days and I will provide more information on what was said and what it all means as soon as I can. In the meantime, one of the people who attended these hearings was kind enough to send his notes and they provide for some interesting reading. The disclaimer on this is that these notes come from a third party who was at the hearings and their accuracy has not been verified with the benefit of transcripts.
[UPDATE: it turns out that transcripts of this meeting are not available]

...the judge hearing the application expressed the very same concerns about the PUB order that we have. In fact it was somewhat therapeutic to hear someone express them so eloquently. He said that anyone reading the report would come away with the impression the payday loan service providers were nothing but scum. He stated that the actual order was to be found in the last 10 pages. Everything previous was more or less rhetoric.

He stated that the federal government and the provincial government had enacted the legislation in order to accommodate the payday loan industry. In doing so they have given (their consent) to the practice. He questioned whether the board had the mandate to institute societal objectives. That is the (purview) of the government. If the government didn’t like the industry they could have simply made it illegal.

He went further and questioned where the analysis of the American rates was that the board said it used in coming to its conclusions. In particular he wanted to see the expenses. In the absence of these figures it was like comparing apples and oranges. Wage rates, rent, taxes, supplies were all likely to be very different to U.S. companies as opposed to Canadian firms. To say that because the rate was $17.00 (per) $100 in Indiana this somehow by itself justifies the same rate in Manitoba is to simply ignore reality.

I couldn't have put it better myself. I guess that is why he's a judge and I am writing blog entries.

The next step is for the judge to issue a decision on whether or not to grant The Cash Store leave to appeal. Obviously the initial sentiment sounds positive from an industry and consumer perspective, but there are still a lot more steps to go before we can have some hope of a more balanced order from the Public Utility Board.

I will try to dig up more commentary and hopefully transcripts from these hearings and pass them on as they become available. At the very least, there should be some interesting commentary that stems from the judge's decision, whenever that comes down.