Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Mixed Messages?

Toronto Star Reports on Payday Loan LegislationBoth the Winnipeg Free Press and The Toronto Star are carrying a story today about Federal NDP MP Peggy Nash's proposed private members bill on payday loans. According to The Free Press, Ms. Nash is proposing a bill that "calls on Parliament to create a regulatory process, putting one law in place for how payday loan companies operate across the country."

In theory, a single national regulatory regime would make life easier on a lot of people. Lenders who operate in multiple provinces would lower their compliance costs by only having one set of rules to worry about and provinces could save on the public utility board hearings, licensing bodies and other costs associated with industry oversight.

The trouble is, a lot of money has already been spent to get the regulatory environment to where it is today. After as much as a decade of study by Industry Canada and the Consumer Measures Committee, the regulatory regime was built around a province-by-province solution. In May 2007, the federal government passed Bill C-26, empowering the provinces to regulate the payday loans industry. Since that time, British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick have all passed payday loan legislation. Manitoba has completed its rate setting process and the other provinces are in the midst of doing the same. Industry and consumer groups have spent a great deal of time and money working with each of these provinces to help draft effective legislation, regulations and rate caps.

NDP Press Release on Payday Loan Legislation Bill C-26We will have to wait to see the contents of Ms. Nash's bill, but at first glance, the timing seems a bit off. What is more interesting is that it also seems to contradict the NDP's previous position on payday loan legislation. The following are excerpts from the NDP press release regarding the introduction of Bill C-26:
"NDP Finance Critic Judy Wasylycia-Leis hails today’s introduction of a bill that will allow provincial governments to regulate payday loans as a major breakthrough."

"'We’ll be looking for quick passage of this bill to enable provinces like Manitoba to move ahead with their plans for effective consumer protection as soon as possible.'"
I have already commented on what appears to be political grandstanding on the part of the NDP in Ontario. Hopefully this is not more of the same at the federal level.

Labels: ,

4 Comments:

At June 25, 2008 11:54 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Good commentary!

 
At June 26, 2008 1:28 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Peggy Nash’s proposal is very consistent with the NDP’s position on payday lenders. The party supported C-26, and Nash's proposal goes the extra step of filling the loopholes that the Conservatives didn't with C-26. For example, this article in the Toronto Star talks about the problem of online payday lenders, which isn’t addressed in C-26 or any provincial legislation.(http://www.thestar.com/article/448744 )

While a number of provinces including the NDP in Manitoba have taken the steps to regulate payday lenders, a number of them have not, and likely will not. This will leave many Canadians with no protections from being gouged thousands of percent interest on small loans. Nash and the NDP are moving to fix that loophole, not to undo or duplicate the work that several vigilant provincial governments have already done.

Nash’s motion goes a step further too, by setting up a regime for the development of alternatives to payday lenders, like small short-term loans through banks and credit unions at much lower rates than payday lenders. This model is already being explored abroad, particularly in the UK.

It's time governments at all levels took this issue seriously and explored alternatives to predatory lending.

 
At June 26, 2008 2:39 PM , Blogger Advance View said...

Thanks for the detailed comment on the NDP's position. I just posted an entry about online lenders that I hope addresses some of the misconceptions that are out there.

As I said in this post, I think the idea of a national regulatory regime is a good one, but it would have been more appropriate two or three years ago. For example, Ontario's legislation applies to anyone residing in Ontario who issues or receives a payday loan. That seems to clearly cover online lenders residing in Ontario plus anyone, regardless of where they are located, lending to a resident of Ontario. I am curious to see how Ms. Nash's bill covers this. Will hers trump Ontario's? Also, Newfoundland has stated that they would rather stick with the legislation they have and not apply for designation under C-26, will this new bill force new rules on them? Will Danny Williams be lowering flags as a result?

As for online lending, what will happen to storefront lenders who also offer loans online? Will there be one maximum allowable charge for storefronts (set by the provinces) and a different rate that they can charge online?

I haven't seen a draft of the bill so hopefully these questions are addressed in it. If you know where I can find a copy, feel free to pass it on.

Thanks again for your detailed comment.

 
At June 27, 2008 12:15 AM , Blogger jchapel said...

Nice Article on "Mixed Messages?" although the language you used was little technical, I was able to get only some part of it. Please try to make the language simple, then you can get more comments on your blog.
.................
James Chapel
short term loan

 

Post a Comment

<< Home




Ontario | Manitoba | Alberta | British Columbia | Yukon | Northwest Territories | Nunavut | New Brunswick | Nova Scotia | Prince Edward Island | Newfoundland and Labrador